Structure of the Instrument
The College Student Report asks students to report the frequency with which they engage in dozens of activities that represent good educational practice, such as using the institution's human resources, curricular programs, and other opportunities for learning and development that the college provides. Additional items assess the amount of reading and writing students did during the current school year, the number of hours per week they devoted to schoolwork, extracurricular activities, employment, and family matters, and the nature of their examinations and coursework. Seniors report whether they participated in or took advantage of such learning opportunities as being a part of a learning community, working with a faculty member on a research project, internships, community service, and study abroad. First-year students indicate whether they have done or plan to do these things. Students also record their perceptions of features of the college environment that are associated with achievement, satisfaction, and persistence including the extent to which the institution offers the support students need to succeed academically and the quality of relations between various groups on campus such as faculty and students (Astin, 1993; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991; Tinto, 1993). Then, students estimate their educational and personal growth since starting college in the areas of general knowledge, intellectual skills, written and oral communication skills, personal, social and ethical development, and vocational preparation. These estimates are mindful of a value-added approach to outcomes assessment whereby students make judgments about the progress or gains they have made (Pace, 1984). Direct measures of student satisfaction are obtained from two questions: "How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution?" "If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending?"

Students also provide information about their background, including age, gender, race or ethnicity, living situation, educational status, and major field. Finally, up to 20 additional questions can be added to obtain information specific to an institutional consortium. Schools have the option of linking their students' responses with their own institutional data base in order to examine other aspects of the undergraduate experience or to compare their student's performance with data from other institutions on a mutually-determined basis for purposes of benchmarking and institutional improvement.